Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2024-27435nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: fix reconnection fail due to reserved tag allocation We found a issue on production environment while using NVMe over RDMA, admin_q reconnect failed forever while remote target and network is ok. After dig into it, we found it may caused by a ABBA deadlock due to tag allocation. In my case, the tag was hold by a keep alive request waiting inside admin_q, as we quiesced admin_q while reset ctrl, so the request maked as idle and will not process before reset success. As fabric_q shares tagset with admin_q, while reconnect remote target, we need a tag for connect command, but the only one reserved tag was held by keep alive command which waiting inside admin_q. As a result, we failed to reconnect admin_q forever. In order to fix this issue, I think we should keep two reserved tags for admin queue.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 3 months later

    Published

  3. · 2 years later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2024-27435, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CISA-ADPADP (enrichment)3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.40% · top 65% of all CVEs (15 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.5.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae – < 149afee5c7418ec5db9d7387b9c9a5c1eb7ea2a8
    • affected ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae – < ff2f90f88d78559802466ad1c84ac5bda4416b3a
    • affected ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae – < 6851778504cdb49431809b4ba061903d5f592c96
    • affected ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae – < 262da920896e2f2ab0e3947d9dbee0aa09045818
    • affected ed01fee283a067c72b2d6500046080dbc1bb9dae – < de105068fead55ed5c07ade75e9c8e7f86a00d1d
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 5.12
    • unaffected < 5.12
    • unaffected 6.1.83 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.23 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.7.11 – ≤ 6.7.*
    • unaffected 6.8.2 – ≤ 6.8.*
    • unaffected 6.9 – ≤ *

References

References5

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2024-27435 badge
[![CVE-2024-27435](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2024-27435.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2024-27435)

Record last updated .