Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2025-22003can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: ucan: fix out of bound read in strscpy() source Commit 7fdaf8966aae ("can: ucan: use strscpy() to instead of strncpy()") unintentionally introduced a one byte out of bound read on strscpy()'s source argument (which is kind of ironic knowing that strscpy() is meant to be a more secure alternative :)). Let's consider below buffers: dest[len + 1]; /* will be NUL terminated */ src[len]; /* may not be NUL terminated */ When doing: strncpy(dest, src, len); dest[len] = '\0'; strncpy() will read up to len bytes from src. On the other hand: strscpy(dest, src, len + 1); will read up to len + 1 bytes from src, that is to say, an out of bound read of one byte will occur on src if it is not NUL terminated. Note that the src[len] byte is never copied, but strscpy() still needs to read it to check whether a truncation occurred or not. This exact pattern happened in ucan. The root cause is that the source is not NUL terminated. Instead of doing a copy in a local buffer, directly NUL terminate it as soon as usb_control_msg() returns. With this, the local firmware_str[] variable can be removed. On top of this do a couple refactors: - ucan_ctl_payload->raw is only used for the firmware string, so rename it to ucan_ctl_payload->fw_str and change its type from u8 to char. - ucan_device_request_in() is only used to retrieve the firmware string, so rename it to ucan_get_fw_str() and refactor it to make it directly handle all the string termination logic.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 3 months later

    Published

  3. · 13 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-22003, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
CISA-ADPADP (enrichment)3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.21% · top 88% of all CVEs (14 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 5.5.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 7fdaf8966aae476deafe11f9a0067ff588615444 – < cc29775a8a72d7f3b56cc026796ad99bd65804a7
    • affected 7fdaf8966aae476deafe11f9a0067ff588615444 – < 8cec9e314d3360fc1d8346297c41a6ee45cb45a9
    • affected 7fdaf8966aae476deafe11f9a0067ff588615444 – < a4994161a61bc8fd71d105c579d847cefee99262
    • affected 7fdaf8966aae476deafe11f9a0067ff588615444 – < 1d22a122ffb116c3cf78053e812b8b21f8852ee9
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.2
    • unaffected < 6.2
    • unaffected 6.6.85 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.21 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.13.9 – ≤ 6.13.*
    • unaffected 6.14 – ≤ *

References

References4

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-22003 badge
[![CVE-2025-22003](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-22003.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-22003)

Record last updated .