Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2025-38415Squashfs: check return result of sb_min_blocksize

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Squashfs: check return result of sb_min_blocksize Syzkaller reports an "UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in squashfs_bio_read" bug. Syzkaller forks multiple processes which after mounting the Squashfs filesystem, issues an ioctl("/dev/loop0", LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE, 0x8000). Now if this ioctl occurs at the same time another process is in the process of mounting a Squashfs filesystem on /dev/loop0, the failure occurs. When this happens the following code in squashfs_fill_super() fails. ---- msblk->devblksize = sb_min_blocksize(sb, SQUASHFS_DEVBLK_SIZE); msblk->devblksize_log2 = ffz(~msblk->devblksize); ---- sb_min_blocksize() returns 0, which means msblk->devblksize is set to 0. As a result, ffz(~msblk->devblksize) returns 64, and msblk->devblksize_log2 is set to 64. This subsequently causes the UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/squashfs/block.c:195:36 shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') This commit adds a check for a 0 return by sb_min_blocksize().

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 3 months later

    Published

  3. · 11 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-38415, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
NVDNVD · Analyzed3.1High7.8CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.23% · top 86% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.8.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < db7096ea160e40d78c67fce52e7cc51bde049497
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 549f9e3d7b60d53808c98b9fde49b4f46d0524a5
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 5c51aa862cbeed2f3887f0382a2708956710bd68
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 6abf6b78c6fb112eee495f5636ffcc350dd2ce25
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 4f99357dadbf9c979ad737156ad4c37fadf7c56b
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 0aff95d9bc7fb5400ca8af507429c4b067bdb425
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 295ab18c2dbce8d0ac6ecf7c5187e16e1ac8b282
    • affected 0aa666190509ffab81c202c5095a166be23961ac – < 734aa85390ea693bb7eaf2240623d41b03705c84
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2.6.29
    • unaffected < 2.6.29
    • unaffected 5.4.295 – ≤ 5.4.*
    • unaffected 5.10.239 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.186 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.142 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.94 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.34 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.15.3 – ≤ 6.15.*
    • unaffected 6.16 – ≤ *

References

References10

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-38415 badge
[![CVE-2025-38415](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-38415.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-38415)

Record last updated .