Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2025-38424perf: Fix sample vs do_exit()

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Fix sample vs do_exit() Baisheng Gao reported an ARM64 crash, which Mark decoded as being a synchronous external abort -- most likely due to trying to access MMIO in bad ways. The crash further shows perf trying to do a user stack sample while in exit_mmap()'s tlb_finish_mmu() -- i.e. while tearing down the address space it is trying to access. It turns out that we stop perf after we tear down the userspace mm; a receipie for disaster, since perf likes to access userspace for various reasons. Flip this order by moving up where we stop perf in do_exit(). Additionally, harden PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN and PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER to abort when the current task does not have an mm (exit_mm() makes sure to set current->mm = NULL; before commencing with the actual teardown). Such that CPU wide events don't trip on this same problem.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 3 months later

    Published

  3. · 15 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-38424, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.8CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.22% · top 88% of all CVEs (15 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.8.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 7b8f3c72175c6a63a95cf2e219f8b78e2baad34e
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 507c9a595bad3abd107c6a8857d7fd125d89f386
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < a9f6aab7910a0ef2895797f15c947f6d1053160f
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 975ffddfa2e19823c719459d2364fcaa17673964
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 2ee6044a693735396bb47eeaba1ac3ae26c1c99b
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 456019adaa2f5366b89c868dea9b483179bece54
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 7311970d07c4606362081250da95f2c7901fc0db
    • affected c5ebcedb566ef17bda7b02686e0d658a7bb42ee7 – < 4f6fc782128355931527cefe3eb45338abd8ab39
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 3.7
    • unaffected < 3.7
    • unaffected 5.4.295 – ≤ 5.4.*
    • unaffected 5.10.239 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.186 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.142 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.95 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.35 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.15.4 – ≤ 6.15.*
    • unaffected 6.16 – ≤ *

References

References10

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-38424 badge
[![CVE-2025-38424](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-38424.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-38424)

Record last updated .