Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2025-38468net/sched: Return NULL when htb_lookup_leaf encounters an empty rbtree

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: Return NULL when htb_lookup_leaf encounters an empty rbtree htb_lookup_leaf has a BUG_ON that can trigger with the following: tc qdisc del dev lo root tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 1 tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 64bit tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:1 handle 2: netem tc qdisc add dev lo parent 2:1 handle 3: blackhole ping -I lo -c1 -W0.001 127.0.0.1 The root cause is the following: 1. htb_dequeue calls htb_dequeue_tree which calls the dequeue handler on the selected leaf qdisc 2. netem_dequeue calls enqueue on the child qdisc 3. blackhole_enqueue drops the packet and returns a value that is not just NET_XMIT_SUCCESS 4. Because of this, netem_dequeue calls qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog, and since qlen is now 0, it calls htb_qlen_notify -> htb_deactivate -> htb_deactiviate_prios -> htb_remove_class_from_row -> htb_safe_rb_erase 5. As this is the only class in the selected hprio rbtree, __rb_change_child in __rb_erase_augmented sets the rb_root pointer to NULL 6. Because blackhole_dequeue returns NULL, netem_dequeue returns NULL, which causes htb_dequeue_tree to call htb_lookup_leaf with the same hprio rbtree, and fail the BUG_ON The function graph for this scenario is shown here: 0) | htb_enqueue() { 0) + 13.635 us | netem_enqueue(); 0) 4.719 us | htb_activate_prios(); 0) # 2249.199 us | } 0) | htb_dequeue() { 0) 2.355 us | htb_lookup_leaf(); 0) | netem_dequeue() { 0) + 11.061 us | blackhole_enqueue(); 0) | qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog() { 0) | qdisc_lookup_rcu() { 0) 1.873 us | qdisc_match_from_root(); 0) 6.292 us | } 0) 1.894 us | htb_search(); 0) | htb_qlen_notify() { 0) 2.655 us | htb_deactivate_prios(); 0) 6.933 us | } 0) + 25.227 us | } 0) 1.983 us | blackhole_dequeue(); 0) + 86.553 us | } 0) # 2932.761 us | qdisc_warn_nonwc(); 0) | htb_lookup_leaf() { 0) | BUG_ON(); ------------------------------------------ The full original bug report can be seen here [1]. We can fix this just by returning NULL instead of the BUG_ON, as htb_dequeue_tree returns NULL when htb_lookup_leaf returns NULL. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/pF5XOOIim0IuEfhI-SOxTgRvNoDwuux7UHKnE_Y5-zVd4wmGvNk2ceHjKb8ORnzw0cGwfmVu42g9dL7XyJLf1NEzaztboTWcm0Ogxuojoeo=@willsroot.io/

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 3 months later

    Published

  3. · 16 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-38468, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.20% · top 90% of all CVEs (15 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 5.5.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < fed3570e548a6c9f95c5f4c9e1a7afc1679fd90d
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < 5c0506cd1b1a3b145bda2612bbf7fe78d186c355
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < 850226aef8d28a00cf966ef26d2f8f2bff344535
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < 890a5d423ef0a7bd13447ceaffad21189f557301
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < 7ff2d83ecf2619060f30ecf9fad4f2a700fca344
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < e5c480dc62a3025b8428d4818e722da30ad6804f
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < 3691f84269a23f7edd263e9b6edbc27b7ae332f4
    • affected 512bb43eb5422ee69a1be05ea0d89dc074fac9a2 – < 0e1d5d9b5c5966e2e42e298670808590db5ed628
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2.6.29
    • unaffected < 2.6.29
    • unaffected 5.4.297 – ≤ 5.4.*
    • unaffected 5.10.241 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.190 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.147 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.100 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.40 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.15.8 – ≤ 6.15.*
    • unaffected 6.16 – ≤ *

References

References11

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-38468 badge
[![CVE-2025-38468](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-38468.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-38468)

Record last updated .