Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2025-38710gfs2: Validate i_depth for exhash directories

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Validate i_depth for exhash directories A fuzzer test introduced corruption that ends up with a depth of 0 in dir_e_read(), causing an undefined shift by 32 at: index = hash >> (32 - dip->i_depth); As calculated in an open-coded way in dir_make_exhash(), the minimum depth for an exhash directory is ilog2(sdp->sd_hash_ptrs) and 0 is invalid as sdp->sd_hash_ptrs is fixed as sdp->bsize / 16 at mount time. So we can avoid the undefined behaviour by checking for depth values lower than the minimum in gfs2_dinode_in(). Values greater than the maximum are already being checked for there. Also switch the calculation in dir_make_exhash() to use ilog2() to clarify how the depth is calculated. Tested with the syzkaller repro.c and xfstests '-g quick'.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 5 months later

    Published

  3. · 14 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-38710, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.8CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.16% · top 94% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.8.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < 076e992752e4b24178918f748d75597c80a408d2
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < 366183911b153e9b8cf758e1414e1154d7569337
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < 112bb60cd0e254a369e95aa9941a694ffeca089f
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < cddea0c721106ea480371412d8de21705eb27376
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < 53a0249d68a210c16e961b83adfa82f94ee0a53d
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < b5f46951e62377b6e406fadc18bc3c5bdf1632a7
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < 9680c58675b82348ab84d387e4fa727f7587e1a0
    • affected 9a0045088d888c9c539c8c626a366cb52c0fbdab – < 557c024ca7250bb65ae60f16c02074106c2f197b
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2.6.26
    • unaffected < 2.6.26
    • unaffected 5.10.258 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.209 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.175 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.134 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.43 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.15.11 – ≤ 6.15.*
    • unaffected 6.16.2 – ≤ 6.16.*
    • unaffected 6.17 – ≤ *

References

References8

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-38710 badge
[![CVE-2025-38710](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-38710.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-38710)

Record last updated .