Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2025-39723netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix unbuffered write error handling If all the subrequests in an unbuffered write stream fail, the subrequest collector doesn't update the stream->transferred value and it retains its initial LONG_MAX value. Unfortunately, if all active streams fail, then we take the smallest value of { LONG_MAX, LONG_MAX, ... } as the value to set in wreq->transferred - which is then returned from ->write_iter(). LONG_MAX was chosen as the initial value so that all the streams can be quickly assessed by taking the smallest value of all stream->transferred - but this only works if we've set any of them. Fix this by adding a flag to indicate whether the value in stream->transferred is valid and checking that when we integrate the values. stream->transferred can then be initialised to zero. This was found by running the generic/750 xfstest against cifs with cache=none. It splices data to the target file. Once (if) it has used up all the available scratch space, the writes start failing with ENOSPC. This causes ->write_iter() to fail. However, it was returning wreq->transferred, i.e. LONG_MAX, rather than an error (because it thought the amount transferred was non-zero) and iter_file_splice_write() would then try to clean up that amount of pipe bufferage - leading to an oops when it overran. The kernel log showed: CIFS: VFS: Send error in write = -28 followed by: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 with: RIP: 0010:iter_file_splice_write+0x3a4/0x520 do_splice+0x197/0x4e0 or: RIP: 0010:pipe_buf_release (include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h:282) iter_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:755) Also put a warning check into splice to announce if ->write_iter() returned that it had written more than it was asked to.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 5 months later

    Published

  3. · 11 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-39723, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.1CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1High7.8CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.24% · top 84% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.1.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 288ace2f57c9d06dd2e42bd80d03747d879a4068 – < f08c80af3c9a9849cd178b4843b7c01d103506a1
    • affected 288ace2f57c9d06dd2e42bd80d03747d879a4068 – < 387164a2b97e1f5404c6d0049a7409bac7d2bc5b
    • affected 288ace2f57c9d06dd2e42bd80d03747d879a4068 – < a3de58b12ce074ec05b8741fa28d62ccb1070468
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.10
    • unaffected < 6.10
    • unaffected 6.12.44 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.16.4 – ≤ 6.16.*
    • unaffected 6.17 – ≤ *

References

References3

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-39723 badge
[![CVE-2025-39723](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-39723.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-39723)

Record last updated .