Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API documentationPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • AboutPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage
Back

CVE-2025-71072

shmem: fix recovery on rename failures

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: shmem: fix recovery on rename failures maple_tree insertions can fail if we are seriously short on memory; simple_offset_rename() does not recover well if it runs into that. The same goes for simple_offset_rename_exchange(). Moreover, shmem_whiteout() expects that if it succeeds, the caller will progress to d_move(), i.e. that shmem_rename2() won't fail past the successful call of shmem_whiteout(). Not hard to fix, fortunately - mtree_store() can't fail if the index we are trying to store into is already present in the tree as a singleton. For simple_offset_rename_exchange() that's enough - we just need to be careful about the order of operations. For simple_offset_rename() solution is to preinsert the target into the tree for new_dir; the rest can be done without any potentially failing operations. That preinsertion has to be done in shmem_rename2() rather than in simple_offset_rename() itself - otherwise we'd need to deal with the possibility of failure after successful shmem_whiteout().

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. Published

  3. · 9 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2025-71072, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High8.2CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.36% · top 70% of all CVEs (9 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 8.2.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected a2e459555c5f9da3e619b7e47a63f98574dc75f1 – < 8fdbc6f9a994eb327868a4aa74a58953f31a2d0f
    • affected a2e459555c5f9da3e619b7e47a63f98574dc75f1 – < 4b0fe71fb3965d0db83cdfc2f4fe0b3227d70113
    • affected a2e459555c5f9da3e619b7e47a63f98574dc75f1 – < 4642686699a46718d7f2fb5acd1e9d866a9d9cca
    • affected a2e459555c5f9da3e619b7e47a63f98574dc75f1 – < e1b4c6a58304fd490124cc2b454d80edc786665c
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.6
    • unaffected < 6.6
    • unaffected 6.6.160 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.64 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.3 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 6.19 – ≤ *

References

4

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2025-71072 badge
[![CVE-2025-71072](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2025-71072.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2025-71072)

Record last updated .