Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API documentationPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • AboutPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage
Back

CVE-2026-23398

icmp: fix NULL pointer dereference in icmp_tag_validation()

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: icmp: fix NULL pointer dereference in icmp_tag_validation() icmp_tag_validation() unconditionally dereferences the result of rcu_dereference(inet_protos[proto]) without checking for NULL. The inet_protos[] array is sparse -- only about 15 of 256 protocol numbers have registered handlers. When ip_no_pmtu_disc is set to 3 (hardened PMTU mode) and the kernel receives an ICMP Fragmentation Needed error with a quoted inner IP header containing an unregistered protocol number, the NULL dereference causes a kernel panic in softirq context. Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017] RIP: 0010:icmp_unreach (net/ipv4/icmp.c:1085 net/ipv4/icmp.c:1143) Call Trace: <IRQ> icmp_rcv (net/ipv4/icmp.c:1527) ip_protocol_deliver_rcu (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207) ip_local_deliver_finish (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:242) ip_local_deliver (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:262) ip_rcv (net/ipv4/ip_input.c:573) __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:6164) process_backlog (net/core/dev.c:6628) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:561) </IRQ> Add a NULL check before accessing icmp_strict_tag_validation. If the protocol has no registered handler, return false since it cannot perform strict tag validation.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 2 months later

    Published

  3. · 7 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-23398, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.13% · top 97% of all CVEs (9 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 5.5.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < 571d9d7b650f02d1e38c01128817868bceac9edd
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < d783fa413c702ff0f8f8bea63f862e28eeaf39e3
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < 1f9f2c6d4b2a613b7756fc5679c5116ba2ca0161
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < b61529c357f1ee4d64836eb142a542d2e7ad67ce
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < 9647e99d2a617c355d2b378be0ff6d0e848fd579
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < d938dd5a0ad780c891ea3bc94cae7405f11e618a
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < 1e4e2f5e48cec0cccaea9815fb9486c084ba41e2
    • affected 8ed1dc44d3e9e8387a104b1ae8f92e9a3fbf1b1e – < 614aefe56af8e13331e50220c936fc0689cf5675
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 3.14
    • unaffected < 3.14
    • unaffected 5.10.253 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.203 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.167 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.130 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.78 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.20 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 6.19.10 – ≤ 6.19.*
    • unaffected 7.0 – ≤ *

References

12

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-23398 badge
[![CVE-2026-23398](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-23398.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-23398)

Record last updated .