Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-43026netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ctnetlink: zero expect NAT fields when CTA_EXPECT_NAT absent ctnetlink_alloc_expect() allocates expectations from a non-zeroing slab cache via nf_ct_expect_alloc(). When CTA_EXPECT_NAT is not present in the netlink message, saved_addr and saved_proto are never initialized. Stale data from a previous slab occupant can then be dumped to userspace by ctnetlink_exp_dump_expect(), which checks these fields to decide whether to emit CTA_EXPECT_NAT. The safe sibling nf_ct_expect_init(), used by the packet path, explicitly zeroes these fields. Zero saved_addr, saved_proto and dir in the else branch, guarded by IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) since these fields only exist when NAT is enabled. Confirmed by priming the expect slab with NAT-bearing expectations, freeing them, creating a new expectation without CTA_EXPECT_NAT, and observing that the ctnetlink dump emits a spurious CTA_EXPECT_NAT containing stale data from the prior allocation.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. Published

  3. · 6 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-43026, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Medium5.5CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.13% · top 97% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 5.5.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < a5a89db6981a1ddf2314bf50cb49db5a3146185f
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < 1c2ebdeff8d088a2e47ae25d7b38447249adace2
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < a64b7bf84b4d5ea54218c5d374ec87fff9000f43
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < 2898080c054ea4d6ddfaaf21bbedbc229a9a8376
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < fd002ff2ea030cbfb0188a11b3c60ce7f84485f4
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < 929f7a9a7aad9404a5867216c3f8738232355b38
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < bff0f4f06f12d6d9bc565a3e1378abd4f6f5ce36
    • affected 076a0ca02644657b13e4af363f487ced2942e9cb – < 35177c6877134a21315f37d57a5577846225623e
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 3.4
    • unaffected < 3.4
    • unaffected 5.10.253 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.203 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.168 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.134 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.81 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.22 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 6.19.12 – ≤ 6.19.*
    • unaffected 7.0 – ≤ *

References

References11

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-43026 badge
[![CVE-2026-43026](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-43026.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-43026)

Record last updated .