CVE-2026-45855ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation
- 5.5MediumCVSS base score
- 0.17%Exploitation in 30 daysEPSS · top 94% of all CVEs
- NoKnown exploitednot in CISA's KEV catalog
- NonePublic exploitsnone known yet
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ata: libata-scsi: avoid Non-NCQ command starvation When a non-NCQ command is issued while NCQ commands are being executed, ata_scsi_qc_issue() indicates to the SCSI layer that the command issuing should be deferred by returning SCSI_MLQUEUE_XXX_BUSY. This command deferring is correct and as mandated by the ACS specifications since NCQ and non-NCQ commands cannot be mixed. However, in the case of a host adapter using multiple submission queues, when the target device is under a constant load of NCQ commands, there are no guarantees that requeueing the non-NCQ command will be executed later and it may be deferred again repeatedly as other submission queues can constantly issue NCQ commands from different CPUs ahead of the non-NCQ command. This can lead to very long delays for the execution of non-NCQ commands, and even complete starvation for these commands in the worst case scenario. Since the block layer and the SCSI layer do not distinguish between queueable (NCQ) and non queueable (non-NCQ) commands, libata-scsi SAT implementation must ensure forward progress for non-NCQ commands in the presence of NCQ command traffic. This is similar to what SAS HBAs with a hardware/firmware based SAT implementation do. Implement such forward progress guarantee by limiting requeueing of non-NCQ commands from ata_scsi_qc_issue(): when a non-NCQ command is received and NCQ commands are in-flight, do not force a requeue of the non-NCQ command by returning SCSI_MLQUEUE_XXX_BUSY and instead return 0 to indicate that the command was accepted but hold on to the qc using the new deferred_qc field of struct ata_port. This deferred qc will be issued using the work item deferred_qc_work running the function ata_scsi_deferred_qc_work() once all in-flight commands complete, which is checked with the port qc_defer() callback return value indicating that no further delay is necessary. This check is done using the helper function ata_scsi_schedule_deferred_qc() which is called from ata_scsi_qc_complete(). This thus excludes this mechanism from all internal non-NCQ commands issued by ATA EH. When a port deferred_qc is non NULL, that is, the port has a command waiting for the device queue to drain, the issuing of all incoming commands (both NCQ and non-NCQ) is deferred using the regular busy mechanism. This simplifies the code and also avoids potential denial of service problems if a user issues too many non-NCQ commands. Finally, whenever ata EH is scheduled, regardless of the reason, a deferred qc is always requeued so that it can be retried once EH completes. This is done by calling the function ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc() from ata_eh_set_pending(). This avoids the need for any special processing for the deferred qc in case of NCQ error, link or device reset, or device timeout.
Timeline
ID reserved
By Linux
- 14 days later
· 14 days later
Published
- 5 months later
· 5 months later
Record updated
Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.
Scores
| Scored by | CVSS | Score | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDNVD · Modified | 3.1 | Medium5.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
- EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
- 0.17% · top 94% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
- CISA SSVC
- Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 5.5.
Affected products
- affected bdb01301f3ea51a59eff252b06643fc1fe843e57 – < c475bfce918dc413c4d59b97710b94b1c955ea5f
- affected bdb01301f3ea51a59eff252b06643fc1fe843e57 – < ce22aaed011206fed9cbd8c9c2d44718607f31ee
- affected bdb01301f3ea51a59eff252b06643fc1fe843e57 – < 888cd7e40adb2ef4af1b4d3b6e2e83ad409ae8c2
- affected bdb01301f3ea51a59eff252b06643fc1fe843e57 – < 5d61a38a60e62750526d94663b69b7ac5c7f07a5
- affected bdb01301f3ea51a59eff252b06643fc1fe843e57 – < 0ea84089dbf62a92dc7889c79e6b18fc89260808
- affected 5.10
- unaffected < 5.10
- unaffected 6.1.191 – ≤ 6.1.*
- unaffected 6.12.77 – ≤ 6.12.*
- unaffected 6.18.14 – ≤ 6.18.*
- unaffected 6.19.4 – ≤ 6.19.*
- unaffected 7.0 – ≤ *
References
References5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c475bfce918dc413c4d59b97710b94b1c955ea5f (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce22aaed011206fed9cbd8c9c2d44718607f31ee (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/888cd7e40adb2ef4af1b4d3b6e2e83ad409ae8c2 (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d61a38a60e62750526d94663b69b7ac5c7f07a5 (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ea84089dbf62a92dc7889c79e6b18fc89260808 (opens in a new tab)
Sources
The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.
- CVE.org record (opens in a new tab)
- CVE List JSON (GitHub) (opens in a new tab)
- NVD (opens in a new tab)
- FIRST EPSS (opens in a new tab)
- EUVD EUVD-2026-32321 (opens in a new tab)
- OSV.dev (opens in a new tab)
- GitHub Advisories (opens in a new tab)
- CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup (opens in a new tab)
Badge for a README or a ticket
[](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-45855)Record last updated .