Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-45859netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation Ulrich reports a regression with nfqueue: If an application did not set the 'F_GSO' capability flag and a gso packet with an unconfirmed nf_conn entry is received all packets are now dropped instead of queued, because the check happens after skb_gso_segment(). In that case, we did have exclusive ownership of the skb and its associated conntrack entry. The elevated use count is due to skb_clone happening via skb_gso_segment(). Move the check so that its peformed vs. the aggregated packet. Then, annotate the individual segments except the first one so we can do a 2nd check at reinject time. For the normal case, where userspace does in-order reinjects, this avoids packet drops: first reinjected segment continues traversal and confirms entry, remaining segments observe the confirmed entry. While at it, simplify nf_ct_drop_unconfirmed(): We only care about unconfirmed entries with a refcnt > 1, there is no need to special-case dying entries. This only happens with UDP. With TCP, the only unconfirmed packet will be the TCP SYN, those aren't aggregated by GRO. Next patch adds a udpgro test case to cover this scenario.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 14 days later

    Published

  3. · 5 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-45859, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1High7.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.71% · top 46% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.5.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6dcc8ba8a6074bb79040f502dc66ad23a58a1c86 – < 4666688657e1054278b836b825fb88b2907e2da2
    • affected 74e6eb7fd27ef1ccc68041dbc66e6d80d2e4a1a0 – < aead84bdacd77e08357fd718e5dcaffaf387f3c3
    • affected 7d8dc1c7be8d3509e8f5164dd5df64c8e34d7eeb – < 79b713ef4261a8ead96af4703f89d0b5f25532e2
    • affected 7d8dc1c7be8d3509e8f5164dd5df64c8e34d7eeb – < 23901aa6b8a2f294c4b774436b4691f3ff863a8f
    • affected 7d8dc1c7be8d3509e8f5164dd5df64c8e34d7eeb – < b740e7ddd7ca0dbfeafca3f5e52717206cf28524
    • affected 7d8dc1c7be8d3509e8f5164dd5df64c8e34d7eeb – < 207b3ebacb6113acaaec0d171d5307032c690004
    • affected 6c4a0ba674f410ab99a30a16f32dac0ebfed5cd3
    • affected 025b3326c5c409b372d0103ad30f174e55adbd1b
    • affected 6.1.107 – < 6.1.191
    • affected 6.6.48 – < 6.6.160
    • affected 5.15.166 – < 5.16
    • affected 6.10.7 – < 6.11
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.11
    • unaffected < 6.11
    • unaffected 6.1.191 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.160 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.75 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.14 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 6.19.4 – ≤ 6.19.*
    • unaffected 7.0 – ≤ *

References

References6

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-45859 badge
[![CVE-2026-45859](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-45859.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-45859)

Record last updated .