Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-64232

block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments against the bottom queue, because "the queue settings related to segment counting may differ from the original queue." The exact same reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver's underlying queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a different count than the cached rq->nr_integrity_segments inherited from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone(). When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue's actual count, blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips BUG_ON(segments > rq->nr_integrity_segments); on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this. Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue's max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via <linux/blk-integrity.h>, which blk-mq.c includes. This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the integrity-segment accounting in line with the existing phys-segment accounting.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 5 days later

    Published

  3. · 3 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-64232, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1Critical9.8CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVDNVD · Modified3.1Critical9.8CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.43% · top 62% of all CVEs (11 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Critical 9.8.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 76c313f658d2752e8527610677164aa7094ef7a5 – < 53a01bcc0242590eda4c452a5bd996f62457113b
    • affected 76c313f658d2752e8527610677164aa7094ef7a5 – < 0943f81e1b3176f27dbaf6db268fc69d8a94f0ba
    • affected 76c313f658d2752e8527610677164aa7094ef7a5 – < 42929c98d044f126508baf54a65b0f87f932fa75
    • affected 76c313f658d2752e8527610677164aa7094ef7a5 – < 2c6e6a18a37b905cb584eb0dda3ae482162a81ca
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.12
    • unaffected < 6.12
    • unaffected 6.12.92 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.34 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.0.11 – ≤ 7.0.*
    • unaffected 7.1 – ≤ *

References

References4

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-64232 badge
[![CVE-2026-64232](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-64232.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-64232)

Record last updated .