Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-72157net: thunderbolt: Fix frags[] overflow by bounding frame_count

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: thunderbolt: Fix frags[] overflow by bounding frame_count tbnet_poll() assembles a multi-frame ThunderboltIP packet into one skb. The first frame goes into the skb linear area and every further frame is added as a page fragment. skb_add_rx_frag(skb, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, page, hdr_size, frame_size, TBNET_RX_PAGE_SIZE - hdr_size); A packet of frame_count frames therefore ends up with frame_count - 1 fragments. tbnet_check_frame() only bounds the peer supplied frame_count to TBNET_RING_SIZE / 4 (64), which is far above MAX_SKB_FRAGS (17 by default). A peer that sends a packet of 19 or more small frames pushes nr_frags past MAX_SKB_FRAGS, so skb_add_rx_frag() writes past skb_shinfo()->frags[] and corrupts memory after the shared info. Tighten the start of packet bound to MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 so a packet can never produce more fragments than frags[] can hold. This matches the recent skb frags overflow fixes in other receive paths, for example f0813bcd2d9d ("net: wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path") and 600dc40554dc ("net: usb: cdc-phonet: fix skb frags[] overflow in rx_complete()").

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 6 days later

    Published

  3. · 2 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-72157, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High8.8CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
NVDNVD · Received3.1High8.8CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.35% · top 70% of all CVEs (15 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 8.8.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < f96b3b35c622d565eff2438993e028d280163f5c
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < 6262f51e09d8dc8b07599a9e4f03bd3989d13fff
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < 569ba39b2d12995a29dc158e5b4de6e449278f30
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < 2b3b4e5ff5a58ad32817824b0310e63908b12052
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < e27beb4536cbf1d59e2d8c2840e87d972aba906f
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < e5824d5b841d99a2bcdd4e2c256643293bbc22c1
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < fe6b606fbf0c3beb94ccf17fcf31d8c2138264e3
    • affected e69b6c02b4c3b8d03be7136f90dd9551ad5a5a5e – < 55d9895f89970501fe126d1026b586b04a224c27
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 4.15
    • unaffected < 4.15
    • unaffected 5.10.266 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.217 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.184 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.145 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.97 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.40 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.1.5 – ≤ 7.1.*
    • unaffected 7.2 – ≤ *

References

References8

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-72157 badge
[![CVE-2026-72157](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-72157.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-72157)

Record last updated .