Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-72256netfilter: xt_cluster: reject template conntracks in hash match

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: xt_cluster: reject template conntracks in hash match xt_cluster_mt() treats any non-NULL nf_ct_get() result as a fully initialized conntrack and passes it to xt_cluster_hash(). This causes a state confusion bug when the raw table CT target attaches a template conntrack to skb->_nfct before normal conntrack processing. Templates carry IPS_TEMPLATE status but do not have a valid tuple for hashing yet, so xt_cluster_hash() can hit its WARN_ON() path on the zeroed l3num field. Reject template conntracks before hashing them. This matches existing netfilter handling for template objects and avoids hashing incomplete conntrack state.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 6 days later

    Published

  3. · 3 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.22% · top 88% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < 4558bd7b47c7be82dffd837f27be8ea3ecee557d
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < d5f9d050b0b267227c1f02f11021872c7768a9cc
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < 4cb8b5f586e41c187942291cc0938006077fa79e
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < fac2fdac3baad9ffd12b3b0bba4374d4b3585d54
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < 13ea4f86cf738c74be2146886ac261988a631e62
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < 07f9ddbf5e799c24a3a52ec9bd7b729a6f6d69d5
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < 5b2d4f0010018a7aa3495aa1dbf1b7a34011e7aa
    • affected 0269ea4937343536ec7e85649932bc8c9686ea78 – < 5feba91006ec92da57acc1cc2e34df623b98541e
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2.6.30
    • unaffected < 2.6.30
    • unaffected 5.10.261 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.212 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.178 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.145 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.97 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.40 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.1.5 – ≤ 7.1.*
    • unaffected 7.2 – ≤ *

References

References8

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-72256 badge
[![CVE-2026-72256](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-72256.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-72256)

Record last updated .