CVE-2026-7366IBM DataPower Gateway affected by HTTP request header leakage in XML-Firewall
- 4.2MediumCVSS base score
- 0.16%Exploitation in 30 daysEPSS · top 94% of all CVEs
- NoKnown exploitednot in CISA's KEV catalog
- NonePublic exploitsnone known yet
Description
IBM DataPower Gateway 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.1 and IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.21 and IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.9 allows a race condition that results in improper isolation of request state when handling the built‑in X‑Client‑IP header. Under concurrent request processing, X‑Client‑IP values may be contaminated across requests, enabling IP spoofing and disclosure of other clients’ IP addresses.
Timeline
ID reserved
By ibm
- 4 months later
· 4 months later
Published
- 53 days later
· 53 days later
Record updated
Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.
Scores
| Scored by | CVSS | Score | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| ibmCNA (assigner) | 3.1 | Medium4.2 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N |
| NVDNVD · Analyzed | 3.1 | Medium4.2 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N |
- EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
- 0.16% · top 94% of all CVEs (12 Nov 2026)
- CISA SSVC
- Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 4.2.
Affected products
IBM · DataPower Gateway 11.0.0
- affected 11.0.0.0 – ≤ 11.0.0.1
IBM · DataPower Gateway 10.5.0
- affected 10.5.0.0 – ≤ 10.5.0.21
IBM · DataPower Gateway 10.6.0
- affected 10.6.0.0 – ≤ 10.6.0.9
What to do
Solution: IBM strongly advises upgrading as soon as possible. APAR: DT469107 https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/defect/aCIgJ000000D4FV/dt469107 Affected VersionsFixed in ReleaseIBM DataPower Gateway 11.0.0 11.0.0.0 - 11.0.0.111.0.0.2IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0 10.5.0.0 - 10.5.0.2110.5.0.22IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6.0 10.6.0.0 - 10.6.0.910.6.0.10
Workaround: Disable persistent connections to an XML Firewall service or don't set the X-Client-IP header on the client request.
References
References1
- https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282770 (opens in a new tab)vendor-advisorypatch
Sources
The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.
- CVE.org record (opens in a new tab)
- CVE List JSON (GitHub) (opens in a new tab)
- NVD (opens in a new tab)
- FIRST EPSS (opens in a new tab)
- EUVD EUVD-2026-57640 (opens in a new tab)
- OSV.dev (opens in a new tab)
- GitHub Advisories (opens in a new tab)
- CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup (opens in a new tab)
Badge for a README or a ticket
[](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-7366)Record last updated .