Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-80901

ipvs: fix the checksum validations

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvs: fix the checksum validations ip_vs_in_icmp_v6() is missing checksum validation for ICMPv6 packets from clients. In fact, as for TCP/UDP we should validate the checksum for ICMP packets only when we mangle the packets on MASQ or on reply for tunnel. Also, Sashiko points out that handle_response_icmp() being common for IPv4 and IPv6 is missing the pseudo-header calculation while validating ICMPv6 messages from real servers which is a problem if checksum is not validated by the hardware. Fix the problems by creating ip_vs_checksum_common_check() helper and use it for TCP/UDP/ICMP both for IPv4 and IPv6. Rely on the nf_checksum() for validating the ICMP messages but use it also for TCP and UDP. Use correct IP offset for IP_VS_DBG_RL_PKT for TCP/UDP/SCTP. IPVS packets (TCP/UDP/SCTP/ICMP) do not need checksum validation on LOCAL_OUT (local clients or local real servers) and on FORWARD (traffic from servers on LAN). Do it only on LOCAL_IN, in case nf_checksum() is not called on PRE_ROUTING. Also, ip_vs_checksum_complete() can be marked static.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 9 days later

    Published

  3. · 2 months later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.16% · top 95% of all CVEs (11 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2a3b791e6e1169f374224d164738e9f7be703d77 – < d418d73acf8be62744dc47359dfdde8c2148845d
    • affected 2a3b791e6e1169f374224d164738e9f7be703d77 – < b3869d9b54e76dff64118dee4c8fd9302fcd5171
    • affected 2a3b791e6e1169f374224d164738e9f7be703d77 – < 9cbe2c0fdb71904ee929b1851cdc1c73341a03c0
    • affected 2a3b791e6e1169f374224d164738e9f7be703d77 – < 00eb23829fd08df1b5e057cb6b625996a70e7e65
    • affected 2a3b791e6e1169f374224d164738e9f7be703d77 – < 5558a85add073215b298f3e044ff9a6d86d714ae
    • affected 2a3b791e6e1169f374224d164738e9f7be703d77 – < e876b75b9020a97bbdc79721e7fc749024891c65
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 2.6.28
    • unaffected < 2.6.28
    • unaffected 6.1.183 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.151 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.103 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.44 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.1.8 – ≤ 7.1.*
    • unaffected 7.2 – ≤ *

References

References6

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-80901 badge
[![CVE-2026-80901](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-80901.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-80901)

Record last updated .