CVE-2026-89495ocfs2: bound namelen in dlm_migrate_request_handler
- 9.8CriticalCVSS base score
- 0.71%Exploitation in 30 daysEPSS · top 46% of all CVEs
- NoKnown exploitednot in CISA's KEV catalog
- NonePublic exploitsnone known yet
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: bound namelen in dlm_migrate_request_handler Patch series "ocfs2/dlm: bound peer-controlled lengths in the o2dlm". The o2dlm receive handlers trust u8 length and count fields from the wire without bounding them, so a node in a DLM domain can corrupt or panic any other node with a malformed message. Three defects: - dlm_migrate_request_handler() passes migrate->namelen unchecked to dlm_init_mle(), which memcpy()s it into the 32-byte mname[] of an o2dlm_mle slab object: a heap out-of-bounds write of up to ~215 attacker-controlled bytes. - dlm_mig_lockres_handler() passes mres->lockname_len unchecked to dlm_init_lockres(), which memcpy()s it into the 32-byte o2dlm_lockname slab object: a heap out-of-bounds write of up to ~223 bytes. - the same handler trusts mres->num_locks without checking that the message is large enough to hold that many entries, so dlm_process_recovery_data() walks mres->ml[] past the kmalloc(data_len) copy and trips a BUG_ON (an out-of-bounds read ending in a panic). The other o2dlm receive handlers already reject an oversized name; the migration and recovery handlers have omitted it since the DLM was added (see the Fixes tags). Patch 1 bounds namelen; patch 2 validates lockname_len, num_locks, and the payload size. Conforming recovery and migration traffic is unaffected. o2net authenticates peers only by the DLM domain key, so any node that has joined the domain -- including a compromised or malicious member -- can send these messages. There is no local trigger; the attacker must already be a member of the cluster. Each sink was confirmed under KASAN with an out-of-tree module mirroring it exactly -- a kmem_cache/kmalloc of the real destination size, then the same unclamped memcpy/loop: slab-out-of-bounds Write for the two writes, Read for the recovery walk, and a panic. A userspace AddressSanitizer build faults identically under -m32 and -m64. Scrubbed logs are available on request. I reported this privately to [email protected] and the ocfs2 maintainers on 2026-06-20; with no response after the standard embargo period I am posting the fix publicly. I have no embargo requirement. This patch (of 2): A node receiving a DLM_MIGRATE_REQUEST message trusts the peer-supplied name length (migrate->namelen) without bounding it. dlm_init_mle() then copies that many bytes into the fixed DLM_LOCKID_NAME_MAX-byte mname[] array of an o2dlm_mle slab object, so a malformed message from a cluster peer overflows the slab object by up to ~215 bytes: a heap out-of-bounds write of attacker-controlled data, reachable by any node in the domain. Reject an oversized name, the way dlm_master_request_handler() and the other o2dlm receive handlers already do; the migration handler omits the check entirely. Conforming messages are unaffected.
Timeline
ID reserved
By Linux
Published
- 38 days later
· 38 days later
Record updated
Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.
Scores
| Scored by | CVSS | Score | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinuxCNA (assigner) | 3.1 | Critical9.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| NVDNVD · Received | 3.1 | Critical9.8 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
- EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
- 0.71% · top 46% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Critical 9.8.
Affected products
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < e1288865b8ceac0dcd1009ecba43de961f13d5bd
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < aabc5d8388e6f8826345f0073455dbcaaaa6491d
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < 006c96ea488eca2ef5155ec76038e0a4dbf65f0a
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < 24989909d3413b44b104102caa6661b1e424ba0f
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < f8658ee3327f73bd81c0bcd07cdeb5a8527fac98
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < de10cd3b062a5235af754925fcf49beb5a1109d4
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < 2487bea2098322669f0563baff53e797486b823f
- affected 6714d8e86bf443f6f7af50f9d432025649f091f5 – < ea5b5609305a8437bc955a0834a530c12246d78f
- affected 2.6.16
- unaffected < 2.6.16
- unaffected 5.10.270 – ≤ 5.10.*
- unaffected 5.15.221 – ≤ 5.15.*
- unaffected 6.1.188 – ≤ 6.1.*
- unaffected 6.6.157 – ≤ 6.6.*
- unaffected 6.12.109 – ≤ 6.12.*
- unaffected 6.18.50 – ≤ 6.18.*
- unaffected 7.2.4 – ≤ 7.2.*
- unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *
References
References8
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1288865b8ceac0dcd1009ecba43de961f13d5bd (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aabc5d8388e6f8826345f0073455dbcaaaa6491d (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/006c96ea488eca2ef5155ec76038e0a4dbf65f0a (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/24989909d3413b44b104102caa6661b1e424ba0f (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8658ee3327f73bd81c0bcd07cdeb5a8527fac98 (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de10cd3b062a5235af754925fcf49beb5a1109d4 (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2487bea2098322669f0563baff53e797486b823f (opens in a new tab)
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea5b5609305a8437bc955a0834a530c12246d78f (opens in a new tab)
Sources
The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.
- CVE.org record (opens in a new tab)
- CVE List JSON (GitHub) (opens in a new tab)
- NVD (opens in a new tab)
- FIRST EPSS (opens in a new tab)
- EUVD EUVD-2026-76401 (opens in a new tab)
- OSV.dev (opens in a new tab)
- GitHub Advisories (opens in a new tab)
- CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup (opens in a new tab)
Badge for a README or a ticket
[](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-89495)Record last updated .