Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-89720

ubifs: fix out-of-bounds read in signature length check

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ubifs: fix out-of-bounds read in signature length check ubifs_sb_verify_signature() bounds the on-disk ubifs_sig_node->len field before handing the signature payload to verify_pkcs7_signature(), but the check has the wrong sign: if (le32_to_cpu(signode->len) > snod->len + sizeof(struct ubifs_sig_node)) The signature bytes start sizeof(struct ubifs_sig_node) (UBIFS_SIG_NODE_SZ, 64 bytes) into the node, so the payload is at most snod->len - sizeof(struct ubifs_sig_node) bytes long. Adding the header size instead of subtracting it accepts a declared length up to 2 * UBIFS_SIG_NODE_SZ larger than the node actually holds -- past the end of c->sbuf, which is vmalloc(c->leb_size). verify_pkcs7_signature() -> pkcs7_parse_message() -> asn1_ber_decoder() is then handed that inflated length and reads beyond the allocation while walking the DER headers. The node length comes straight from the mounted image, so a crafted signed UBIFS image reaches this via ubifs_read_superblock() before the signature is cryptographically checked. snod->len is guaranteed to be >= UBIFS_SIG_NODE_SZ by the node scanner (c->ranges[UBIFS_SIG_NODE].min_len == UBIFS_SIG_NODE_SZ), so the corrected subtraction cannot underflow. Legitimately signed images are unaffected: a correct superblock never declares a signature longer than the node it is embedded in.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. Published

  3. · 38 days later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-89720, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
LinuxCNA (assigner)3.1High7.7CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
NVDNVD · Received3.1High7.7CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.18% · top 92% of all CVEs (11 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: High 7.7.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < ab7405bd86331cc2dbc8201699d4adc33bea75e7
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < 11abc34698cb3172badf8aa12e623f1bac98bbd8
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < 8cc3da72cf57acb4b77442ea8cec48425dff7c06
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < 37a9d25a563f5f9103282954ce573c4a61321e7c
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < f76b79d6e42af20682495bccd22f72c7164b0018
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < a1dc246f98bb94233effa4fa3ec7bf84700bb7d1
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < 83e1aa9f5f906c9b1f4949d0521f0f950a159d96
    • affected 817aa094842dfc3a6b98c9582d4a647827f66201 – < 95d27c1708bb6e8823c8e7c623f9abc2a91bf4bf
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 5.3
    • unaffected < 5.3
    • unaffected 5.10.270 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.221 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.188 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.157 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.109 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.50 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.4 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References8

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-89720 badge
[![CVE-2026-89720](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-89720.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-89720)

Record last updated .