Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-90183blk-iolatency: clear delay state when freeing policy data

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-iolatency: clear delay state when freeing policy data io.latency can throttle a group which has no latency target of its own. When a sibling misses its target, check_scale_change() scales down its peers, and a peer that reaches queue depth one gets blkcg_use_delay() called on it on every further scale-down, even with min_lat_nsec == 0. iolatency_pd_offline() resets the target through iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec(), which clears the delay only on a nonzero to zero transition, so it never clears such a peer. Freeing the policy data then leaves blkg->use_delay set and blkcg->congestion_count elevated with nothing left that can drop it. blk_cgroup_congested() then returns true for every task in that cgroup and its descendants for as long as the cgroup lives: page_cache_sync_ra() cuts readahead to a single page, page_cache_async_ra() skips it altogether, and __folio_throttle_swaprate() takes swap_avail_lock and schedules a throttle on anonymous folio allocation. Clear the delay in iolatency_pd_free(). By then bio-held blkg references have drained, or the queue is frozen for policy deactivation, so check_scale_change() cannot re-arm it. The free callback can also see policy data which was never attached to a blkg, hence the pd->blkg check.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 6 days later

    Published

  3. · 43 days later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.21% · top 89% of all CVEs (14 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected d70675121546c35feaceebf7ed9caed8716640f3 – < 27573278b1cbc2313ebd31309ac18ac6179b828a
    • affected d70675121546c35feaceebf7ed9caed8716640f3 – < 53ccb4b967edc5f82ff6f9c066fb96c31aa7561a
    • affected d70675121546c35feaceebf7ed9caed8716640f3 – < b6449a915d1826e1450f6368fc379fe44caa06ca
    • affected d70675121546c35feaceebf7ed9caed8716640f3 – < 5c6593422eb3c3a21505436ccf74599a433584c8
    • affected d70675121546c35feaceebf7ed9caed8716640f3 – < 02f1b90ab33ef99c89dd96a385b432ff57abc64d
    • affected d70675121546c35feaceebf7ed9caed8716640f3 – < 8935bf22c0a0db517a7f72f7097300e05dd852f5
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 4.19
    • unaffected < 4.19
    • unaffected 6.1.191 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.160 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.114 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.57 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.6 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References6

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-90183 badge
[![CVE-2026-90183](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-90183.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-90183)

Record last updated .