Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-90359bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Reject >8 byte return values on return-reading trampoline paths btf_distill_func_proto() builds the function model used for the fentry/fexit/fmod_ret/fsession trampolines and struct_ops. It has accepted a 16-byte __int128 return value since the trampoline was introduced: __get_type_size() returns the integer's type size, and the return-type check only rejected ret < 0. But the BPF trampoline preserves only 8 bytes of the return value (RAX on x86, i.e. R0). For an attach type that reads the target's return value the second half (RDX / R3) is neither saved nor restored, so a program attached to a function returning a 16-byte value corrupts the value seen by the real caller and itself observes only half of it. struct_ops trampolines have the same limitation. This affects the attach types that read the target's return value: fexit, fmod_ret and fsession (plus the _multi variants of fexit and fsession), and struct_ops. fentry/fentry_multi run before the target returns and are unaffected. Reject a >8 byte return value for these attach types in bpf_check_attach_target() and bpf_check_attach_btf_id_multi(), and for struct_ops in bpf_struct_ops_desc_init().

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 6 days later

    Published

  3. · 34 days later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.20% · top 90% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected fec56f5890d93fc2ed74166c397dc186b1c25951 – < de54ba33690d2dd3c4aa686c9693505644285b0b
    • affected fec56f5890d93fc2ed74166c397dc186b1c25951 – < 9a9e902bd0556052534641f7d5f868c6dc4b84ae
    • affected fec56f5890d93fc2ed74166c397dc186b1c25951 – < d36ac53fc83baf843c51b7afd6d2471f36b713d8
    • affected fec56f5890d93fc2ed74166c397dc186b1c25951 – < c48796aa6c392cde93946e5d5a9a1f1b1cf72feb
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 5.5
    • unaffected < 5.5
    • unaffected 6.12.114 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.57 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.6 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References4

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-90359 badge
[![CVE-2026-90359](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-90359.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-90359)

Record last updated .