Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-90400md: recheck spare changes before starting sync

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: md: recheck spare changes before starting sync remove_spares() and remove_and_add_spares() modify the array's rdev configuration. These operations are only safe after the array has been suspended. md_start_sync() checks whether spare configuration changes are needed before taking reconfig_mutex. However, the rdev state can change before the mutex is acquired, so the initial check can become stale. In that case, md_choose_sync_action() may remove or replace rdevs while normal I/O is still accessing them. The race can occur as follows: raid10d Worker Normal IO ____________ _______________________ ______________________ raid10_write_request() wait_blocked_dev() set Blocked set Faulty Skip Faulty rdev rrdev->nr_pending++ .repl_bio = bio removeable_rdev = false . array not suspended . lock mddev goto err_handle lock mddev (wait) . update sb . clear Blocked . . unlock mddev . lock mddev (acquires) remove_spares() removeable_rdev = true raid10_remove_disk() rdev = replacement replacement = NULL rdev_dec_pending(NULL) unlock mddev (NULL)->nr_pending-- In this case, rdev_dec_pending() is called with a NULL pointer, resulting in a NULL pointer dereference when attempting to decrement nr_pending. Fix this by suspending the array when spare configuration changes are needed, including for non-read-write arrays, and checking again after taking reconfig_mutex. If the array was not already suspended and a change is now needed, release the mutex, suspend the array, and reacquire the mutex before continuing.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 6 days later

    Published

  3. · 32 days later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.17% · top 94% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected bc08041b32abe6c9824f78735bac22018eabfc06 – < c3777d16bc3335c0ac4bdad0551c80d38c5d94cc
    • affected bc08041b32abe6c9824f78735bac22018eabfc06 – < e5ac7ab78467b064f1da8b0f3042a63595fafcfd
    • affected bc08041b32abe6c9824f78735bac22018eabfc06 – < 81b39df5d701976cf20e52f33106c1fc1603b4cb
    • affected bc08041b32abe6c9824f78735bac22018eabfc06 – < c7d34d17ea43ebc86b45d439ebb435e11ca44bca
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.7
    • unaffected < 6.7
    • unaffected 6.12.110 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.52 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.6 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References4

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-90400 badge
[![CVE-2026-90400](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-90400.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-90400)

Record last updated .