Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-93650Saleor throttling.py get_client_ip excessive authentication

Description

A vulnerability was determined in Saleor up to 3.20.118/3.21.54/3.22.47/3.23.14. This vulnerability affects the function get_client_ip of the file saleor/account/throttling.py. Executing a manipulation can lead to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. The attack can be executed remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The projects own issue #19203 internal ticket admits "IP can be spoofed in most deployments" and that its REAL_IP_ENVIRON-type setting bypasses get_client_ip; fix (right-to-left RFC 7239 hop selection) proposed but still unmerged. The vendor explains within an email, that "[t]his is not a vulnerability, this is working at intended, Saleor expects XFF to be configured properly".

Public exploit

An exploit or proof of concept is public: anyone can try it against an unpatched system. A reference of the record is tagged as an exploit. CISA's SSVC rates its exploitation: a proof of concept is public.

Show the exploits1

References tagged exploit1 reference

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By VulDB

  2. Published

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-93650, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
VulDBCNA (assigner)4.0Medium6.3CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
VulDBCNA (assigner)3.1Low3.7CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:R
VulDBCNA (assigner)3.0Low3.7CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:X/RC:R
VulDBCNA (assigner)2.0Low2.6AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:C
NVDNVD · Deferred4.0Low2.9CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.69% · top 47% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 6.3.

Affected products

  • Saleor

    • affected 3.20.118
    • affected 3.21.0
    • affected 3.21.1
    • affected 3.21.2
    • affected 3.21.3
    • affected 3.21.4
    • affected 3.21.5
    • affected 3.21.6
    • affected 3.21.7
    • affected 3.21.8
    • affected 3.21.9
    • affected 3.21.10
    • affected 3.21.11
    • affected 3.21.12
    • affected 3.21.13
    • affected 3.21.14
    • affected 3.21.15
    • affected 3.21.16
    • affected 3.21.17
    • affected 3.21.18
    • affected 3.21.19
    • affected 3.21.20
    • affected 3.21.21
    • affected 3.21.22
    • affected 3.21.23
    • affected 3.21.24
    • affected 3.21.25
    • affected 3.21.26
    • affected 3.21.27
    • affected 3.21.28
    • affected 3.21.29
    • affected 3.21.30
    • affected 3.21.31
    • affected 3.21.32
    • affected 3.21.33
    • affected 3.21.34
    • affected 3.21.35
    • affected 3.21.36
    • affected 3.21.37
    • affected 3.21.38
    • and 79 more

References

References7

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-93650 badge
[![CVE-2026-93650](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-93650.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-93650)

Record last updated .