Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-9557A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Mautic's Focus component. Due to insufficient validation of user-supplied…

Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Mautic's Focus component. Due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, an authenticated user can trigger outbound HTTP requests from the hosting server, enabling internal network reconnaissance or forcing requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Mautic

  2. · 3 days later

    Published

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-9557, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
MauticCNA (assigner)3.1Medium6.4CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
NVDNVD · Deferred3.1Medium6.4CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.15% · top 96% of all CVEs (13 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Medium 6.4.

Affected products

  • mautic/core

    • affected 4.0.0 – < 4.4.20
    • affected 5.0.0 – < 5.2.11
    • affected 6.0.0 – < 6.0.9
    • affected 7.0.0 – < 7.1.2

Affected packages

From reviewed advisories of the GitHub Advisory Database.

What to do

Workaround: There are no official workarounds. To completely mitigate the exposure without upgrading, disabling or limiting external network access from the Mautic web server to internal-only subnets and local hosts is recommended.

References

References1

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-9557 badge
[![CVE-2026-9557](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-9557.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-9557)

Record last updated .