Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-97764django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an…

Description

django-allauth before 65.19.4 does not have the expected limits on failed login attempts because, in some common configurations, an attacker can leverage the handling of diacritics (e.g., accents) for a higher effective limit.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By mitre

  2. Published

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

CVSS scores of CVE-2026-97764, by who scored it
Scored byCVSSScoreVector
mitreCNA (assigner)3.1Low3.7CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
NVDNVD · Deferred3.1Low3.7CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.23% · top 87% of all CVEs (15 Nov 2026)
CISA SSVC
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Low 3.7.

Affected products

What to do

Solution: Upgrade django-allauth to version 65.19.4 (latest).

Workaround: The vulnerability is NOT exposed if any of the following settings is enabled. 65.4 and later: ACCOUNT_LOGIN_METHODS = {"email"} 65.3 and earlier: ACCOUNT_AUTHENTICATION_METHOD = "email"

References

References5

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-97764 badge
[![CVE-2026-97764](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-97764.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-97764)

Record last updated .