Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-97900drm/drm_exec: fix up contended obj when num_objects is 0

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/drm_exec: fix up contended obj when num_objects is 0 drm_exec_prepare_array() silently returns success without calling drm_exec_lock_contended() when num_objects is zero. This breaks the invariant upheld by drm_exec_lock_obj(), where every entry point into the locking sequence must first attempt to lock any previously contended object before proceeding. Drivers that chain multiple drm_exec_prepare_array() calls per drm_exec_until_all_locked() iteration (e.g. amdgpu's userq signal/wait ioctls, which prepare separate read and write BO arrays) can pass an empty array for one of the two calls. If contention is hit while preparing the non-empty array, exec->contended is set and the loop retries; on retry, the empty-array call preceding it is a no-op that never clears exec->contended, so drm_exec_retry_on_contention() immediately jumps back to the top of the loop without ever reaching the call that would resolve the contention. This spins forever. Fix it by having drm_exec_prepare_array() call drm_exec_lock_contended() directly when num_objects is zero, so a pending contended object dont loop infinitely.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. Published

  3. · 24 days later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.17% · top 94% of all CVEs (12 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 09593216bff15866f95c8ad406cb7fdcec1ee40a – < 506cfed91e50cc8055799480a2fde5a18f63a21c
    • affected 09593216bff15866f95c8ad406cb7fdcec1ee40a – < 831cd124ce99c3e61266bed30519d52f7c26abed
    • affected 09593216bff15866f95c8ad406cb7fdcec1ee40a – < f3e74866018dab793ebee1fdf0ef34f7271d1f8c
    • affected 09593216bff15866f95c8ad406cb7fdcec1ee40a – < a565022c02f218ec9789c2baf4690792e7a48cbb
    • affected 09593216bff15866f95c8ad406cb7fdcec1ee40a – < 159720704d9d652b64390c11fb971e15b0a78d23
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.6
    • unaffected < 6.6
    • unaffected 6.6.158 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.111 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.53 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.7 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References5

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-97900 badge
[![CVE-2026-97900](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-97900.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-97900)

Record last updated .