Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-98581nfc: llcp: Fix list corruption / refcount desync in nfc_llcp_recv_dm()

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: Fix list corruption / refcount desync in nfc_llcp_recv_dm() nfc_llcp_recv_dm() handles DM(NOBOUND)/DM(REJ) for a socket that is still linked on local->connecting_sockets: it looks the socket up with nfc_llcp_connecting_sock_get(), sets sk->sk_state = LLCP_CLOSED and returns, without taking the socket lock and without unlinking the socket from the connecting_sockets list. llcp_sock_release() selects the list to unlink from by sk_state: a socket in LLCP_CONNECTING is unlinked from connecting_sockets, otherwise from the sockets list. Because recv_dm left the socket physically on connecting_sockets but in the LLCP_CLOSED state, release() takes the else branch and calls nfc_llcp_sock_unlink(&local->sockets, sk). That runs sk_del_node_init() while holding sockets.lock, i.e. it removes the socket from the connecting_sockets hlist under the wrong lock. A concurrent connect() linking another socket onto connecting_sockets under connecting_sockets.lock then mutates the same hlist unserialized, which corrupts the list and desyncs the sk_add_node()/sk_del_node_init() sock_hold()/__sock_put() pairing. An unprivileged local process holding LLCP sockets, with the DM supplied by the remote peer over an established LLCP link, can drive this to leak kernel sockets without bound (the mis-decrement goes through the non-freeing __sock_put() path, so the object is never released), leading to memory exhaustion / DoS. This is the same class of bug that was fixed in the sibling handler nfc_llcp_recv_cc() by commit b493ea2765cc ("nfc: llcp: Fix use-after-free race in nfc_llcp_recv_cc()"); recv_dm did not receive the equivalent fix. Fix it the same way: take lock_sock(), re-check that the socket is still hashed (release() may have won the race), and for the NOBOUND/REJ case unlink it from connecting_sockets before moving it to LLCP_CLOSED. The unlink drops the connecting_sockets membership reference via sk_del_node_init(), leaving the socket unhashed, so the later nfc_llcp_sock_unlink() in llcp_sock_release() becomes a no-op and no double put occurs.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 23 days later

    Published

  3. · 1 day later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.22% · top 88% of all CVEs (14 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < dd2d24add86b3b63cd87cf2feff98ae119ba19a6
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < 812731dd8511f5768f4ff279b3c18d85cd21da4b
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < dba1d9c7134afcb4b1bfad8c1b1b3f0ab5189b08
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < c1e9ed52a6697354366dddf190fbacee8ed2f7c5
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < 7fb2c0eeb79bfad64065f539a453138abd0edda6
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < b94cf09720543cc34256c7aa88f8059cbe7c0419
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < 320a2ff49bdce3f9a437b9a9ff341ff27d3bdbf1
    • affected a69f32af86e389dd232b1bb2269e202c1bfcc60f – < bf1460acdf8cf5a07c819f59785d40f20d113099
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 3.6
    • unaffected < 3.6
    • unaffected 5.10.271 – ≤ 5.10.*
    • unaffected 5.15.222 – ≤ 5.15.*
    • unaffected 6.1.189 – ≤ 6.1.*
    • unaffected 6.6.158 – ≤ 6.6.*
    • unaffected 6.12.112 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.55 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.9 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References8

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-98581 badge
[![CVE-2026-98581](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-98581.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-98581)

Record last updated .