Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-98949drm/imagination: Fix reference and vm_bo handling in remap()

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/imagination: Fix reference and vm_bo handling in remap() When a map overlaps part of an existing mapping, pvr_vm_gpuva_remap() splits the mapping into prev/next parts covering what the request did not take, instead of creating something new. It gets two things wrong. - A GEM reference is taken for each part but it's never needed and never dropped, so it leaks one reference per split (remap-next-in-2m in tests/imagination/pvr_vm_map.c): CRITICAL: 33558528 bytes of shmem still held after close - The parts still belong to the original object being split, but pvr_vm_gpuva_remap() links them to ctx->gpuvm_bo, the new object's vm_bo: prev_va --obj--> BO_A BO_B <--obj-- vm_bo (ctx->gpuvm_bo) \___________link___________/ (mismatch: BO_A != BO_B) drm_gpuva_link() catches the mismatch: WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c:2108 at drm_gpuva_link+0x2ec/0x310 drm_WARN_ON(obj != vm_bo->obj) Call trace: drm_gpuva_link pvr_vm_gpuva_remap __drm_gpuvm_sm_map pvr_vm_map pvr_ioctl_vm_map Link them to op->remap.unmap->va->vm_bo instead. The locking of the GPUVA lists of the other objects touched by a split is not addressed here; it is handled by switching the GPUVM to immediate mode.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 28 days later

    Published

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.17% · top 94% of all CVEs (14 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected ff5f643de0bf27874c4033cd57a0bd034b5c7d11 – < 521cf8403a185a9d5790fe324bb43ba7ea85f51c
    • affected ff5f643de0bf27874c4033cd57a0bd034b5c7d11 – < 9caa2eca5cc8372517ff36a83f321d4326abae93
    • affected ff5f643de0bf27874c4033cd57a0bd034b5c7d11 – < 784356aa88b82035d70e9faeded49b70cddeb29e
    • affected ff5f643de0bf27874c4033cd57a0bd034b5c7d11 – < 196d4d10c1b33ae176685ff42a9994a5952b1d0f
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.8
    • unaffected < 6.8
    • unaffected 6.12.113 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.57 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.11 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3 – ≤ *

References

References4

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-98949 badge
[![CVE-2026-98949](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-98949.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-98949)

Record last updated .