Skip to content
CVE Ledger
  • Newest CVEsPage
  • Recently added to KEVPage
  • Rising exploitation (EPSS)Page
  • Weekly digestPage
  • StatisticsPage
  • WatchlistPage
  • API docsPage
  • MCP serverPage
  • AboutPage
  • Data sourcesPage
  • Data statusPage
  • ChangelogPage
  • How it's builtPage
  • Support the projectPage

14 results

Back

CVE-2026-99230io_uring/cmd: don't leave list poison in ->hash_node

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/cmd: don't leave list poison in ->hash_node io_uring_cmd_del_cancelable() uses hlist_del() to take a command off ->cancelable_uring_cmd, which leaves LIST_POISON1/2 behind in ->hash_node. Requests are recycled through the request cache without being reinitialised, and not every user of ->hash_node sets it up before it is used: If a vectored futex wait is woken while futex_wait_multiple_setup() is still queueing the futexes, io_futexv_wait() doesn't add the request to ->futex_list, and leaves the completion to the task_work queued by the wake up. io_futexv_complete() ends in __io_futex_complete(), whose hlist_del_init() is fine for a request that is unhashed, which is how all other users of the node leave it. If the request was a cancelable uring_cmd in its previous life, e.g. a ublk FETCH_REQ, it writes through LIST_POISON2: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000120-...] RIP: 0010:io_futexv_complete+0x219/0x420 Call Trace: tctx_task_work_run+0x804/0x950 tctx_task_work+0x71/0xa0 task_work_run+0x118/0x200 Leave the node unhashed.

Timeline

  1. ID reserved

    By Linux

  2. · 38 days later

    Published

  3. · 4 days later

    Record updated

Changes after publication (a new score, a public exploit, EPSS crossing 1, 10 or 50 %, leaving KEV) are kept since November 2026; earlier ones are not known.

Scores

No CVSS score yet: neither the CNA, CISA nor NVD has scored this CVE. NVD status: Received.

EPSS (exploitation in 30 days)
0.16% · top 95% of all CVEs (15 Nov 2026)
Loading the EPSS history…

The list uses the assigner's score when there is one, then CISA's, then NVD's: Not scored.

Affected products

  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 93b8cc60c37b9d17732b7a297e5dca29b50a990d – < cc7f13d006fcefed9564bd79f135b51d344e9c77
    • affected 93b8cc60c37b9d17732b7a297e5dca29b50a990d – < 2d5af21422060c088f6e4fb0f1e7dcf5bcdd6707
    • affected 93b8cc60c37b9d17732b7a297e5dca29b50a990d – < 685b49483200384d7f49d338af476e26e6824637
    • affected 93b8cc60c37b9d17732b7a297e5dca29b50a990d – < c4fe1024b2f3f40f8010591a0c0ad541e2883eda
    • affected 93b8cc60c37b9d17732b7a297e5dca29b50a990d – < 4c83e39f4d1944d7146fd06094f2c8053238d55c
  • Linux · Linux

    • affected 6.7
    • unaffected < 6.7
    • unaffected 6.12.115 – ≤ 6.12.*
    • unaffected 6.18.60 – ≤ 6.18.*
    • unaffected 7.2.14 – ≤ 7.2.*
    • unaffected 7.3.2 – ≤ 7.3.*
    • unaffected 7.4-rc1 – ≤ *

References

References5

Sources

The same CVE in the primary databases and aggregators, to check against.

Badge for a README or a ticket

CVE-2026-99230 badge
[![CVE-2026-99230](https://cveledger.app/badge/CVE-2026-99230.svg)](https://cveledger.app/cve/CVE-2026-99230)

Record last updated .